.
Interesting quotes aplenty from the ‘Apple and Samsung, frenemies for life‘ Reuters article this weekend…
Tim Cook, Jobs’ successor as Apple chief executive, was opposed to suing Samsung in the first place, according to people with knowledge of the matter, largely because of that company’s critical role as a supplier of components for the iPhone and the iPad…
…Cook, worried about the critical supplier relationship, was opposed to suing Samsung. But Jobs had run out of patience, suspecting that Samsung was counting on the supplier relationship to shield it from retribution.
Apple filed suit in April 2011, and the conflagration soon spread to courts in Europe, Asia and Australia. When Apple won its blockbuster billion-dollar jury verdict against Samsung last August, it appeared that it might be able to achieve an outright ban on the offending products – which would have dramatically altered the smartphone competition.
But, as the Samsung vs. Apple trial runs down to an effective stalemate, the Reuters opinion is that Apple is likely to settle. The fact that Tim Cook was never in favor of suing Samsung to begin with (and he has said on multiple occasions that he hates litigation) makes it all the more likely that a settlement will take place.
Steve Jobs was of course willing to go Thermonuclear and spend every last cent of Apple’s money to drive Android phones out of business, calling Android ‘stolen products’ according to the Walter Isssacson authorized biography.
As the article pointed out, Apple has been moving swiftly is reducing its reliance on its one time ally but still has a lot tied up in displays, memory, storage and perhaps most important, Ax processor manufacture.
Perhaps the legal battles have been overblown, as one source suggests:
“People play this stuff up because it shows a kind of drama, but the business reality is that the temperature isn’t that high,” said one attorney who has observed executives from both companies.
Another interesting tidbit on the genesis of the Apple-Samsung relationship:
google_ad_slot = "3906033006";
// ]]>
The memory market in 2005 was extremely unstable, and Apple wanted to lock in a supplier that was rock-solid financially, people familiar with the relationship said. Samsung held about 50 percent of the NAND flash memory market at that time.
“Whoever controls flash is going to control this space in consumer electronics,” Jobs said at the time, according to a source familiar with the discussions.
Related articles
- Tim Cook | Apple Town Hall meeting (iPhoneTake.com)
- Apple A6 X processor production reportedly goes from Samsung to TSMC, trail set to begin this quarter (iPhoneTake.com)
- Samsung’s chief strategy officer says he’s a Mac, iPhone, & iPad user, prefers Apple’s ecosystem at home (iPhoneTake.com)
- Court again rejects Apple’s attempt at Samsung Galaxy Nexus sales ban (9to5google.com)
- Court again rejects Apple’s attempt at Samsung Galaxy Nexus sales ban (iPhoneTake.com)
- Samsung ‘fast follower’ mantra extends to marketing as well (iPhoneTake.com)
- Apple reports $ 54.5b revenue Q1 2013 results: 47.8m iPhones, 22.9m iPads, 4.1m Macs, 12.7m iPods (iPhoneTake.com)
- Samsung ‘fast follower’ mantra extends to marketing as well (9to5google.com)
- Report: Apple has become the #1 mobile phone vendor in the United States for the first time ever (iPhoneTake.com)
- California Apple vs. Samsung case judge rules that Samsung did not willfully infringe Apple’s patents (iPhoneTake.com)
